ISO 26262 and Agile practices:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/invisiblethread/entry/five_benefits_of_agile_practices?lang=en
This is a very interesting article tackling a very tangible problem in industry - footprint of standard implementation. The article explains how the process footprint can be decreased by adopting certain Agile practices.
The article shows that there can be possibilities of tailoring agile to heavier processes where (for example) safety requirements are not something to play around with.
In non-Agile processes, the standard compliance usually takes a lot of effort and requires a lot of documentation. This article shows how this can be combined with agile practices on "minimum" documentation.
Recommended reading for all interested in standards implementation - not only in the automotive industry.
@MiroslawStaron
Paper reviews and highlights of research in the area of software metrics, ISO 15939, ISO 25000, ISO 9126, ISO 26262 www.staron.nu
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Agile metrics from IBM
Software Econometrics
http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/ral14037usen/RAL14037USEN.PDF
This is a nice paper that conceptually describes goals with metrics in the Agile software development. A very good starter reading. I like the concepts and the ideology, but what I lack in the paper is the depth of how to measure things.
Some aspects that come to my mind as and old "metric" guy are:
- How to define "change" in the cost of change metric? What is the difference between rework and change?
- How to define scrap and rework? How to measure those concepts in software development? Is the first feature that one develops to show proof-of-concept a waste - or is it a learning activity?
In short - nice article, but requires digging deeper into the context.
@MiroslawStaron
http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/ral14037usen/RAL14037USEN.PDF
This is a nice paper that conceptually describes goals with metrics in the Agile software development. A very good starter reading. I like the concepts and the ideology, but what I lack in the paper is the depth of how to measure things.
Some aspects that come to my mind as and old "metric" guy are:
- How to define "change" in the cost of change metric? What is the difference between rework and change?
- How to define scrap and rework? How to measure those concepts in software development? Is the first feature that one develops to show proof-of-concept a waste - or is it a learning activity?
In short - nice article, but requires digging deeper into the context.
@MiroslawStaron
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)